ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025
Inverted Cyclops Lesion Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: A Case Report.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cyclops lesions are a well-described complication following reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). These lesions are fibrous nodules that most commonly form anterolateral to the tibial tunnel and impede terminal knee extension. Inverted or femoral-sided cyclops lesions are a rare variant that have been described after ACL reconstruction, but not after repair. This is the first case in the literature to demonstrate an inverted cyclops lesion following ACL repair. Case Report: The authors present a case of a 60-year-old Caucasian female who developed a femoral-sided cyclops lesion after ACL repair. After initially achieving full range of motion (ROM) post-surgery, the patient later experienced a palpable clunk and extension loss 3-months postoperatively. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was unremarkable, subsequent arthroscopy confirmed the diagnosis, leading to successful lesion excision and notchplasty. Conclusion: A high index of suspicion for cyclops lesions is critical in patients presenting with a clunk with terminal extension after ACL repair, even in the absence of MRI evidence. Prompt recognition and intervention are crucial, as demonstrated by the removal of the lesion and notchplasty, which led to full recovery of symptoms and ROM of the knee. The authors aim to broaden the limited existing knowledge of inverted cyclops lesions by presenting a detailed case report of a patient after an ACL repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.