ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Expression of aberrant markers in monitoring of measurable residual disease in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients during remission-inducing therapy phase.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) is characterized by an abnormal proliferation of immature cells in bone marrow. Leukemic blasts at diagnosis exhibit a so-called leukemia associated immunophenotype (LAIP), which is further used for determination of measurable residual disease (MRD) levels at particular time points during the therapy. Nevertheless, in some patients LAIP proves insufficient for discrimination of blasts from their normal counterparts, therefore, search for novel, aberrant markers is essential. A crucial requirement for these antigens is their expression variability throughout the entire treatment monitoring period. Methods: The aim of the study was to assess the expression level of four markers: CD66c, CD304, CD72 and CD86 on leukemic cells at diagnosis and at day 15 and 33 of treatment to compare stability of their expression. We also correlated the results obtained with the most common genetic aberrations identified at the diagnosis of BCP-ALL, such as: hyper- hypodiploidy, Results: In more than 90% of patients, CD86 overexpression on blast cells was proven at day 15 of treatment and in almost 93% during the entire remission-inducting therapy (day 33). Similarly high positivity rate on leukemic blasts was found for CD72 antigen, which at day 15 was positive in 82% of patients and dropped to 43% at day 33 of treatment. We also found a correlation between the presence of hyperdiploidy and Discussion: The obtained results demonstrate that CD86 and CD72 can be successfully used as additional markers for MRD assessment in BCP-ALL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.