SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Gait in depression: a bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping of research trends over the past 20 years.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Depression carries a high risk of suicide, with many individuals failing to receive treatment due to diagnostic challenges and stigma. Gait is linked to depression, underscoring the importance of gait analysis in the diagnosis and treatment of depression. However, comprehensive and objective evaluations of the current research on gait in depression are lacking. This study aims to use bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping to clarify research trends and status. Objective: This study employs bibliometric analysis to investigate gait in depression, summarizing historical and current trends while predicting future directions. This analysis will aid researchers and policymakers in understanding evolving trends and prioritizing research resources effectively. Methods: We conducted a computer-based search of the Web of Science core collection to identify articles and reviews related to depression and gait. Bibliometric analysis, involving the analysis of aspects such as countries or regions, institutions, authors, journals, keywords, and references, was performed using Excel 365, CiteSpace, and VOSViewer. Results: The analysis included a total of 848 publications from 2005 to 2024. The results showed a phased increase in publications, peaking in 2020 with 102 publications, followed by a gradual decline. Citations in this field showed a yearly increase, peaking in 2022 with 3920 citations before subsequently declining. The United States was identified as the most productive and influential country in this field, with the highest number of publications and citations. They have the institutions with the highest publications and citations. Leading authors in this field include Verghese Joe, Shimada Hiroyuki; and Rochester Lynn. Key journals include BMC Geriatrics, Journals of Gerontology Series and Medical Sciences, and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. Frequently mentioned keywords in this field are depression, gait, gait speed, older adults, and dementia. Identification of distinctive gait patterns in depression, gait characteristics in the elderly, association between gait and cognitive decline, and interventions for abnormal gait constitute current research forefronts in this domain. Conclusions: This study is the first to utilize bibliometrics to visualize research in the field of gait-related depression. It reveals research trends and frontiers, providing valuable references for scholars seeking important research topics and potential collaborators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.