ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025
Consensus statements for the biopsychosocial care of patients with epidermolysis bullosa South Africa: Part 2.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare, incurable inherited mucocutaneous blistering disorder that can lead to multisystemic complications. In Africa, there are no established consensus statements or clinical guidelines for the care of patients with EB. Aim: To develop comprehensive transdisciplinary consensus statements for the care of patients with EB. This article (Part 2) presents 24 consensus statements focused on the biopsychosocial aspects of EB care. Part 1 addressed diagnostic and clinical management and resulted in 16 consensus statements. Setting: This was a multicentre, multiprovincial study involving healthcare practitioners from Eastern Cape, Free State, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal and Western Cape. Methods: In collaboration with patients and families, the transdisciplinary team of experts developed consensus-based statements through a modified Delphi process. This iterative process involved three consensus rounds with an 80% agreement threshold for each action point to ensure validity and reliability. Results: In total, 24 consensus statements were endorsed. These included holistic patient and family care; cultural considerations; educational inclusion; paediatric and emergency care; psychosocial care; nutritional; gynaecological and ophthalmic support; occupational therapy; physiotherapy and orthopaedic; dental and podiatric management. Conclusion: Comprehensive transdisciplinary care is essential for addressing the holistic needs of patients with EB and their families, particularly in resource-limited and culturally diverse settings. Contribution: This is the first set of consensus statements for the care of EB in South Africa and the broader African continent, offering a culturally sensitive, patient-centred framework for multidisciplinary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.