ArticleThe Angle orthodontist2025
What amount of data is required to develop artificial intelligence that can accurately predict soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery?
Article in The Angle orthodontist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Factors influencing the predictive performance of artificial intelligence for craniofacial growth.The Angle orthodontist · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To suggest a sample size calculation method to develop artificial intelligence (AI) that can predict soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery with clinically acceptable accuracy. Materials and Methods: From data collected from 705 patients who had undergone combined surgical-orthodontic treatment, 10 subsets of the data were generated through random resampling procedures, specifically with reduced data sizes of 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 450, 500, 600, and 700. Resampling was repeated four times, and each subset was used to create a total of 40 AI models using a deep-learning algorithm. The prediction results for soft tissue change after orthognathic surgery were compared across all 40 AI models based on their sample sizes. Clinically acceptable accuracy was set as a 1.5-mm prediction error. The predictive performance of AI models was evaluated on the lower lip, which was selected as a primary outcome variable and a benchmark landmark. Linear regression analysis was conducted to estimate the relationship between sample size and prediction error. Results: The prediction error decreased with increasing sample size. A sample size greater than 1700 datasets was estimated as being required for the development of an AI model with a prediction error < 1.5 mm at the lower lip area. Conclusions: A fairly large quantity of orthognathic surgery data seemed to be necessary to develop software programs for visualizing surgical treatment objectives with clinically acceptable accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.