ArticleHawai'i journal of health & social welfare2025
Evaluating Medical Students' Confidence in Musculoskeletal Examination: Implications for Improving Musculoskeletal Medicine Education.
Article in Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Musculoskeletal anatomy education perspectives.Rheumatology international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In response to feedback from previous medical students, the office of medical education at a state-funded medical school (University of Hawaii) conducted an IRB-approved survey study to formally evaluate the experience of current medical students regarding their confidence with MSK examination skills, and solicited suggestions for improvement. We collected data from students who were transitioning from second to third year regarding the following: (1) confidence in various physical exams, (2) perceived preparedness for clerkships, (3) usefulness of existing MSK clinical activities, and (4) suggestions for improvement. A majority of students expressed lack of confidence in the MSK physical exam, which was notably lower than other organ system exams. Recommendations for curriculum improvement included early integration of MSK examination teaching with corresponding anatomy laboratory sessions, inclusion of physiatry teaching, and increased small-group learning sessions. This study revealed the need for (1) synchronizing MSK clinical skills training with anatomy curriculum during the first year, and (2) inclusion of physiatry teaching in the MSK curriculum. Ideally, this study will serve as a starting point for further innovations and improvements in MSK medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.