ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Plant Regeneration Trait Syndromes, Tradeoffs, and Linkages to Adult Abundance for Native and Exotic Grassland Plants.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plant Regeneration Trait Syndromes, Tradeoffs, and Linkages to Adult Abundance for Native and Exotic Grassland Plants.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recruitment is the most sensitive plant life stage to environmental filters. Yet, most research linking functional traits to environmental filters has focused on adult plants with little known about early plant traits, their interactions with environmental filters, or their relation to species abundance. Likewise, how such relationships might vary between native and exotic species or influence plant invasion outcomes is unclear. We quantified regeneration traits for 12 native and 12 exotic (naturalized and invasive) forbs and evaluated trait relationships and their associations with species abundance across an environmental gradient in semi-arid grasslands. Species differentiated along two orthogonal trait axes suggestive of two distinct trait syndromes. The first trait syndrome, likely associated with competitive ability, was correlated with seed mass and growth-related seedling traits. Conversely, the second trait syndrome revealed a tradeoff between traits related to development and growth and traits related to resource management. This syndrome may reflect different approaches for seedling stress tolerance and avoidance. Neither trait syndromes nor mean trait values differed between native and exotic species, whether exotics were invasive or naturalized. Two traits and one trait syndrome were significantly associated with adult species abundance on the landscape. First, species with faster seedling maturation were generally more abundant. Naturalized exotic species with lower specific leaf area were also more abundant, suggesting a possible link between lower specific leaf area and greater drought survival. Abundance of native and invasive exotic species was greater for taxa with faster development and growth and thin, carbon-rich leaves, traits associated with stress avoidance. Importantly, the greater abundance of invasive exotics over other taxa was not accounted for by differences in regeneration traits. Evidence of regeneration trait syndromes and tradeoffs points to important selective forces shaping early plant life-history strategies. Linkages between some of these traits and adult plant abundance also suggest a significant role in recruitment success. Better elucidating these traits and their connections to species abundance-particularly across life stages-can help improve our understanding of plant community assembly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.