Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40936582›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy techniques2025

Centrifuge-Free Bone Marrow Aspirate Harvest for Orthopaedic Applications.

Sarah Oyadomari, Anil Ranawat, Dean Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah OyadomariDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, U.S.A.
Anil RanawatHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Dean WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autologous bone marrow aspirate (BMA) is increasingly being used in clinical practice to augment the repair and healing of bone, cartilage, and tendon by delivering mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and growth factors to the site of injury. Traditional BMA harvest and preparation rely on centrifugation to generate a BMA concentrate with a higher concentration of MSCs than the original aspirate. However, this traditional technique may be inefficient and time-consuming, and it could sacrifice sterility. In this technique, we describe a centrifuge-free BMA harvest system (Marrow Cellution; Cervos Medical) that avoids peripheral blood dilution during aspiration, thereby potentially achieving a higher yield of MSCs and growth factors within the BMA without the need for centrifugation.

Identifiers

PMID40936582
PMCPMC12420573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.