ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
The First Microsurgery-assisting Robot Equipped With an Automatic Instrument Exchange System and a Miniature Tool Kit.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Facial Nerve Repair Using a Microsurgical Robot System: A Preclinical Study Using a Rat Model.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Enabling non-microsurgeons to perform supermicrovascular anastomosis using a robotic assistant: A preclinical study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microsurgery requires high precision, stability, and effective teamwork. However, current robotic-assisted surgery faces challenges such as inefficient instrument exchange and dependence on surgical assistants, contributing to prolonged operative times and increased costs. To address these issues and enhance surgical efficiency and surgeon autonomy, we developed a microsurgery-assisting robot equipped with an automated instrument exchange system and a specialized micro tool kit. The robot was tested using chicken-wing arteries and rat vessels with diameters ranging from 0.35 to 0.8 mm. Evaluation parameters included anastomosis time, frequency of instrument exchanges, and vascular patency rates. The automated system completed instrument exchanges accurately within approximately 9 seconds, maintaining a smooth workflow while significantly reducing reliance on assistants. In the rat model, a vascular patency rate of 100% was achieved. Although anastomosis times were slightly longer compared with manual operations performed by skilled surgeons, our system is anticipated to improve accuracy in complex microsurgical procedures involving extremely fine vessels. Conventional microsurgery-assisting robots have primarily focused on performing vascular anastomosis alone; however, our newly developed robot with an automated instrument exchange mechanism effectively facilitates a broader range of tasks, including vessel dissection, trimming, vascular anastomosis, and postoperative patency assessments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.