Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40936467›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2025

Establishing accountability and promoting rights: the WHO QualityRights contribution to mental health, recovery and community inclusion.

Julian Eaton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Julian EatonProfessor in Global Mental Health, Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2697-4965

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention to human rights as a central pillar of global mental health work has shifted from a focus on the right to healthcare to a deeper examination of the quality of care received, and to the way in which people with mental health conditions are treated in all aspects of life. The QualityRights programme is the World Health Organization's flagship guidance for promotion of rights-based approaches to mental healthcare, and a means of holding service providers to account for quality of care provided. A recent evaluation of the QualityRights e-training package demonstrates promising impact on attitude change of participants, raising the prospect of an efficient scale-up of efforts to improve dignity in services and reduce stigma and discrimination.

Indexed as

global mental healthHuman rightsmental health servicespatients and service usersquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID40936467
PMCPMC12451545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.