ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025
Food webs can deliver win-win strategies for tropical agroforestry and biodiversity conservation.
Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Food webs can deliver win-win strategies for tropical agroforestry and biodiversity conservation.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High biodiversity and agricultural productivity are commonly regarded as mutually exclusive. However, functionally diverse communities may provide valuable services to agroecosystems and therefore offer the possibility of win-win strategies. We developed a dynamic mechanistic community model of the bird-arthropod food web associated with African cocoa agroforestry, structurally informed by metabarcoding data on bird diets, and fitted to trapping data on species abundances. Our novel framework models rates of change and uses space-for-time substitution, thus providing insights into community dynamics without the need for long time-series data. We used our fitted model to predict equilibrium community composition under varying intensities of shade management and pesticide use. Our results indicate that low-intensity farming favors forest bird species, with at least two times the biomass of this bird group compared to any other at high shade cover. Low-intensity farms also favored potential pollinator abundance, while biomass of the main pest species of cocoa, brown capsid, was 25% lower at high shade than at low shade. Our model quantified the net effect of each taxon on the other taxa in the food web: most bird to arthropod interactions were negative, indicating important pest control services provided by birds. Furthermore, our simulations of pesticide application revealed that the long-term effect of pesticide use on biomass of taxa varied according to shade cover. Importantly, pesticide application resulted in the decline of non-pest taxa through trophic cascades: forest birds were the taxa that declined the fastest, and this trend was exacerbated in low shade farms. To achieve a decline of less than 50% in non-pest taxa, pesticide application could only reach 10% in the sunniest farms and 20% in shady farms, which results in a maximal reduction of 19% in pest biomass. By looking at the efficacy of agricultural management through the lens of community interactions, our holistic, quantitative approach demonstrates that low-intensity agriculture may provide a win-win for biodiversity and ecosystem services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.