ArticleGM crops & food2025
Relative safety of glyphosate-resistant maize (CC-2) in rats.
Article in GM crops & food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetically Modified Plants in Agriculture.Biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid adoption of glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops by farmers, the food safety has garnered significant attention. This study aims to evaluate the relative safety of glyphosate-resistant maize (CC-2). Rats were divided into three groups: one group receiving AIN-93 G feed (AIN), one receiving non-modified receptor maize feed (NM), and the other receiving CC-2 maize feed (GM). The intervention spanned from gestation d 0 of the parental rats to 90 d post-weaning of the offspring. The results indicated no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes, body weight, growth monitoring, behavioral tests, or organ indexes between the GM group and the two control groups (AIN and NM). Although there were significant differences in some hematological parameters, serum chemistry, and organ weights, histopathological analysis revealed no abnormalities. No exogenous gene fragments were detected in major organs. In conclusion, CC-2 maize is relative safe for growth and development in rats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.