Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40936415›Full record

ArticleANZ journal of surgery2025

Dual Surgeon Operating to Prevent Colorectal Cancer Surgery Skill Fatigue in Rural Surgery-A Prospective Audit of 154 Patients.

Matthias W Wichmann, Timothy K McCullough, Tom Gunning, Guy J Maddern

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ANZ journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthias W WichmannDepartment of General Surgery, Mount Gambier and Districts Health Service, Mount Gambier, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3482-3916
Timothy K McCulloughDepartment of General Surgery, Mount Gambier and Districts Health Service, Mount Gambier, South Australia, Australia.
Tom GunningDepartment of General Surgery, Mount Gambier and Districts Health Service, Mount Gambier, South Australia, Australia.
Guy J MaddernDepartment of General Surgery, Mount Gambier and Districts Health Service, Mount Gambier, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2064-181X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkill maintenance for rural surgeons is challenging. Surgery for colorectal disease requires a specialised skill set. Dual surgeon operating in low or medium volume centres may mitigate skill fade and improve surgical outcomes. There is a paucity of data on the outcomes of dual surgeon operating.

methodsProspective audit of outcomes after dual surgeon operations for colorectal disease in a non-metropolitan surgical centre. Results are compared with treatment outcomes in the same hospital prior to the dual surgeon approach. Ethics approval CALHN Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref # 12041).

resultsOne hundred fifty-four patients underwent surgery for colorectal cancer during the audit period (November 2015 to February 2025). 60% of the patients were male (N = 92); median age was 70 years. Compared to the historic control (N = 233) there was a significant reduction in wound infections (3.2% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.0038), complications (24% vs. 40%, p = 0.02), intraoperative blood loss (60 vs. 250 mL, p < 0.001) and length of stay (6 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001). The lymph node yield was significantly increased (17 vs. 13, p < 0.001). Significantly more patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery (87% vs. 23.6%, intention to treat, p < 0.00001) with a reduction of conversions (6% vs. 11%, p = 0.28). Outcomes were improved but did not reach statistical significance with regard to 30-day mortality (0.64% vs. 0.86%, p = 0.82), leak rate (2.2% vs. 5.5% of procedures with anastomosis, p = 0.15) and unplanned return to theatre (4.6% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.24).

conclusionsOur findings confirm that two-surgeon operating is feasible and safe for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Significantly better postoperative outcomes can be achieved with regard to complications, blood loss, and length of stay. The approach allows for more than 85% of all procedures to be done minimally invasive. Dual-surgeon operating helps to mitigate skill fade as well as loss of confidence for surgeons performing complex colorectal procedures in a low/medium volume setting.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceColorectal NeoplasmsFatigueSurgeonsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMedical AuditMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective Studiesauditcolorectal cancerdual surgeon operatinglaparoscopic surgerynon‐metropolitanruraltwo surgeon approach

Identifiers

PMID40936415
PMCPMC12571941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.