ArticleDigestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society2025
A Multicenter Pivotal Study on the Artificial Intelligence System for Neoplastic Lesions Detection in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
Article in Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Computer-aided Detection for Identifying Missed Gastric Cancer After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.DEN open · 2027Article
- Article
- AI-Assisted Detection May Help Identify Visible but Missed Gastric Cancers During Routine Upper Endoscopy.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Article
- Clinical Performance of Gastric CADe: Beyond Lesion Recognition From the G-CADe Trial.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Article
- Usefulness of Artificial Intelligence for Transnasal Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Clinical Practice.Cureus · 2026Article
- World Endoscopy Organization Position Statements for Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopic Diagnosis of Gastric Epithelial Neoplasia.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence assistance improves endoscopist accuracy for gastric cancer dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis pivotal study aimed to evaluate the performance of the CAD-EYE prototype in identifying esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and gastric neoplasm (GN) for regulatory approval of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency in Japan.
methodsThis retrospective study utilized image datasets comprising 15 consecutive video frames captured using non-magnifying white-light imaging (WLI), blue laser/light imaging (BLI), and linked color imaging (LCI). The sensitivity and specificity of the CAD-EYE prototype for successful detection were calculated using the gold standard, which consists of image datasets of neoplastic lesions annotated by experienced endoscopists.
resultsA total of 620, 679, and 682 ESCC datasets were analyzed in the WLI, BLI, and LCI groups, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of ESCC detection were 85.9% [81.1%-90.6%] and 93.3% [90.8%-95.7%] in the WLI group, 97.6% [95.6%-99.7%] and 92.9% [90.6%-95.3%] in the BLI group, and 96.6% [94.2%-99.1%] and 93.2% [91.0%-95.5%] in the LCI group. The sensitivities for pT1a ESCC were 85.3%, 97.3%, and 97.2% in the WLI, BLI, and LCI groups, respectively. For GN, 841 WLI and 882 LCI datasets were analyzed. The sensitivity, specificity, and specificity in the detection flag of GN detection were 95.5% [92.8%-98.1%], 86.1%, and 85.4% [82.6%-88.2%] in the WLI group, and 93.9% [91.1%-96.7%], 94.4%, and 93.9% [92.0%-95.8%] in the LCI group, respectively. The sensitivities for pT1a early gastric cancer were 93.8% and 92.4% in the WLI and LCI groups, respectively.
conclusionsThe CAD-EYE prototype demonstrated high sensitivity in detecting ESCC and GN, highlighting its potential as a promising tool for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.