ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025
Thermal drone surveys to detect arboreal fauna: Improving population estimates and threatened species monitoring.
Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating the density of raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) and water deer (Hydropotes inermis) using thermal real-time drone surveys and distance sampling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Thermal drone surveys to detect arboreal fauna: Improving population estimates and threatened species monitoring.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sound methods to determine species occurrence and abundance are crucial for successful wildlife management and conservation. When species communities cannot be readily detected using camera traps or acoustic monitoring, ground survey methods such as spotlighting on foot are commonly used. While able to provide precise detection and density estimates, these methods can be laborious and time consuming and are restricted to surveying small areas. Advances in drone technology now allow for the detection of heat signatures of endothermal wildlife using thermal cameras from the sky, which we contrast to traditional ground surveys. We found that drone and ground surveys achieve similar detection probabilities for nocturnal arboreal mammals of southeastern Australia. Drones achieved high detection rates for targeted arboreal wildlife occurrence and consistently recorded more species and individuals than ground-based surveys via spotlighting. Ground surveys often missed specialist species like the endangered southern greater glider (Petauroides volans) when populations had low densities. Drone-derived density estimates for surveyed areas of 100-200 ha were significantly lower than those extrapolated from 10-ha ground survey results. Thermal drone surveys present a promising tool for measuring and monitoring nocturnal arboreal wildlife populations due to their ability to cover larger areas with comparable detection rates to ground surveys. Drone surveys provide comprehensive information on species assemblage, density, and distribution across management compartment-scale survey areas, offering valuable insights into species occurrence and population status. Drones were particularly effective in areas with dense vegetation or that were otherwise inaccessible for ground-based surveys, enhancing the ability to estimate populations, quantify recovery following large-scale disturbances, and to discover previously undocumented populations. Drone-based wildlife survey methods have the potential to reduce uncertainty in compartment-scale population estimates for improved wildlife monitoring and conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.