Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40936331›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Influence of vessel disturbance on Pacific harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena vomerina) echolocation.

Karina Dracott, Chloe V Robinson, Lauren Dares, Erin Woodley, Amy Migneault, Caitlin Birdsall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Influence of vessel disturbance on Pacific harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena vomerina) echolocation.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karina DracottWhales Initiative, Ocean Wise, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Chloe V RobinsonWhales Initiative, Ocean Wise, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Lauren DaresWhales Initiative, Ocean Wise, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Erin WoodleyWhales Initiative, Ocean Wise, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Amy MigneaultWhales Initiative, Ocean Wise, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Caitlin BirdsallWhales Initiative, Ocean Wise, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

DP World CanadaFisheries and Oceans Canada 18-015-PAC PRFisheries and Oceans Canada 2022-083-Pac-PRLNG CanadaPrince Rupert Port Authority
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vessel disturbance is one of many anthropogenic threats that are negatively impacting coastal cetacean populations worldwide. Noise pollution from vessels can cause varying levels of disturbance in cetaceans, depending on several factors such as vessel type and speed. Pacific harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena vomerina) are distributed throughout coastal waters of the North Pacific Ocean, with large aggregations observed near the entrance to the Port of Prince Rupert in British Columbia, Canada. This area serves as an important year-round foraging ground for harbour porpoises. However, it is also one of the fastest growing container ports in North America, with planned increases in activity. Harbour porpoises are highly sensitive to vessel-related acoustic disturbances, but the effects of vessel activity on their foraging rates remain unclear. In this study, we used a combination of land-based surveys, passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) devices (C-PODs and F-PODs), and automatic identification system (AIS) data to investigate the relationship between vessel activity and harbour porpoise echolocation activity-both foraging and non-foraging-in the heavily trafficked Chatham Sound, adjacent to the Port. Our results show that an increase in the total number of vessels negatively affected both foraging and non-foraging echolocation activity, with less echolocation observed in the presence of more ferries and tugs. Similarly, vessels traveling at higher speeds (>6 m/s kn) had a negative effect on echolocation activity. Tugboats and passenger vessels, in particular, had a wider range of effects on all harbour porpoise echolocation activity. Our findings indicate that implementing a vessel slowdown (~5 m/s) along the approach to the Port of Prince Rupert would reduce disturbances to harbour porpoises and likely benefit other coexisting species that rely on quiet oceans for communication and foraging.

Indexed as

EcholocationNoise, TransportationPhocoenaShipsAnimalsBritish ColumbiaPacific Oceanecholocation activityforaging ecologyinter‐click intervalspacific harbour porpoisepassive acoustic monitoringvessel disturbance

Identifiers

PMID40936331
PMCPMC12426586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.