ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025
Influence of vessel disturbance on Pacific harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena vomerina) echolocation.
Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of vessel disturbance on Pacific harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena vomerina) echolocation.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vessel disturbance is one of many anthropogenic threats that are negatively impacting coastal cetacean populations worldwide. Noise pollution from vessels can cause varying levels of disturbance in cetaceans, depending on several factors such as vessel type and speed. Pacific harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena vomerina) are distributed throughout coastal waters of the North Pacific Ocean, with large aggregations observed near the entrance to the Port of Prince Rupert in British Columbia, Canada. This area serves as an important year-round foraging ground for harbour porpoises. However, it is also one of the fastest growing container ports in North America, with planned increases in activity. Harbour porpoises are highly sensitive to vessel-related acoustic disturbances, but the effects of vessel activity on their foraging rates remain unclear. In this study, we used a combination of land-based surveys, passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) devices (C-PODs and F-PODs), and automatic identification system (AIS) data to investigate the relationship between vessel activity and harbour porpoise echolocation activity-both foraging and non-foraging-in the heavily trafficked Chatham Sound, adjacent to the Port. Our results show that an increase in the total number of vessels negatively affected both foraging and non-foraging echolocation activity, with less echolocation observed in the presence of more ferries and tugs. Similarly, vessels traveling at higher speeds (>6 m/s kn) had a negative effect on echolocation activity. Tugboats and passenger vessels, in particular, had a wider range of effects on all harbour porpoise echolocation activity. Our findings indicate that implementing a vessel slowdown (~5 m/s) along the approach to the Port of Prince Rupert would reduce disturbances to harbour porpoises and likely benefit other coexisting species that rely on quiet oceans for communication and foraging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.