ArticleJournal of veterinary science2025
Genetic diversity and virulence profiling of
Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importance
objectiveThis study characterized
methodsSeventy-four isolates were collected from diverse tissues. Serotypes were determined using multiplex PCR targeting capsular polysaccharide genes, and multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) was conducted with seven housekeeping genes. The virulence-associated genes
resultsSixteen serotypes were identified, with serotype 2 most prevalent (27.0%), followed by serotypes 3, 8, 7, 13, and 4. MLST revealed 41 sequence types, including 26 novel STs. Among virulence genes, CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings underscore the need for continuous surveillance to track serotype shifts and the emergence of novel lineages. Molecular tools such as MLST and virulence gene profiling enhance epidemiological understanding and support risk assessment for this zoonotic bacterium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.