Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40936273›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary science2025

Prevalence of

Itainara Taili, Sungryong Kim, Dong-Hyuk Jeong, Ki-Jeong Na

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Itainara TailiLaboratory of Veterinary Laboratory Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3960-551X
Sungryong KimLaboratory of Veterinary Laboratory Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7423-3884
Dong-Hyuk JeongLaboratory of Wildlife and Conservation Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7604-5721
Ki-Jeong NaLaboratory of Veterinary Laboratory Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6076-3147

Funding

Wildlife Diseases Specialist 2024081308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe raccoon dog (

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the prevalence of

methodsA total of 275 blood samples were collected from raccoon dogs across nine wildlife centers in South Korea. Molecular detection of pathogens was conducted using polymerase chain reaction to identify

resultsThe study revealed an overall infection rate of 10.5% for CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings highlight the raccoon dog as a reservoir for TBPs, especially

Indexed as

AnaplasmosisEhrlichiosisRaccoon DogsRickettsia InfectionsRickettsialesAnaplasmaAnimalsEhrlichiaFemaleMalePrevalenceRepublic of KoreaRickettsiaAnaplasmaEhrlichiaPCRtick-borne pathogenWildlife

Identifiers

PMID40936273
PMCPMC12511886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.