ReviewBiophysical journal2026
Biological processes as exploratory dynamics.
Review in Biophysical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Trajectory Statistics of Biological Exploratory Dynamics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Many will enter, few will win: Cost and sensitivity of exploratory dynamics.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Mapping gene expression dynamics to developmental phenotypes with information entropy analysis.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Polarization as a Process: The Potential of Process Ontology for Understanding Cellular Symmetry Breaking.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many biological processes can be thought of as the result of an underlying dynamics in which the system repeatedly undergoes distinct and abortive trajectories with the dynamical process only ending when some specific process, purpose, structure, or function is achieved. A classic example is the way in which microtubules attach to kinetochores as a prerequisite for chromosome segregation and cell division. In this example, the dynamics is characterized by apparently futile time histories in which microtubules repeatedly grow and shrink without chromosomal attachment. We hypothesize that for biological processes for which it is not the initial conditions that matter, but rather the final state, this kind of exploratory dynamics is biology's unique and necessary solution to achieving these functions with high fidelity. This kind of cause-and-effect relationship can be contrasted to examples from physics and chemistry where the initial conditions determine the outcome. In this paper, we examine the similarities of many biological processes that depend upon random trajectories starting from the initial state and the selection of subsets of these trajectories to achieve some desired functional final state. We begin by reviewing the long history of the principles of dynamics, first in the context of physics, and then in the context of the study of life. These ideas are then stacked up against the broad categories of biological phenomenology that exhibit exploratory dynamics. We then build on earlier work by making a quantitative examination of a succession of increasingly sophisticated models for exploratory dynamics, all of which share the common feature of being a series of repeated trials that ultimately end in a "winning" trajectory. We also explore the ways in which microscopic parameters can be tuned to alter exploratory dynamics as well as the energetic burden of performing such processes. It is a great privilege to take part in this special volume dedicated to the life and work of Prof. Erich Sackmann (1934-2024). For one of us (R.P.), at the time of making a switch from traditional condensed matter physics to a life engaged in the study of life, he went to a meeting near Munich that completely opened his eyes to the ways in which the approach of physics could be brought to bear on the study of the living. Sackmann's work was an inspiring presence at that meeting. One of the hallmarks of his work was a principled approach to dissecting biological processes over a range of scales and phenomena. One common thread to much of his work was that it acknowledged the dynamical character of living organisms. The present paper attempts to follow in the tradition of Sackmann's studies of dynamics by suggesting a new way of looking at many biological processes all through the unifying perspective of what we will call exploratory dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.