Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40936206›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Developing custom computer vision models with Njobvu-AI: A collaborative, user-friendly platform for ecological research.

Cara L Appel, Ashwin Subramanian, Jonathan S Koning, Marnet Ngosi, Christopher M Sullivan, Taal Levi, Damon B Lesmeister

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Developing custom computer vision models with Njobvu-AI: A collaborative, user-friendly platform for ecological research.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cara L AppelDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4761-606X
Ashwin SubramanianCenter for Quantitative Life Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6369-5553
Jonathan S KoningCenter for Quantitative Life Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Marnet NgosiDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6716-4843
Christopher M SullivanCenter for Quantitative Life Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3344-5201
Taal LeviDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1853-8311
Damon B LesmeisterDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1102-0122

Funding

African Parks NetworkUS Agency for International Development in MalawiUSDA Forest Service International ProgramsUSDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer vision models show great promise for assisting researchers with rapid processing of ecological data from many sources, including images from camera traps. Access to user-friendly workflows offering collaborative features, remote and local access, and data control will enable greater adoption of computer vision models and accelerate the time between data collection and analysis for many conservation and research programs. We present Njobvu-AI, a no-code tool for multiuser image labeling, model training, image classification, and review. Using this tool, we demonstrate training and deploying a YOLO multiclass detector model using a modest dataset of 33,664 camera trap images of 37 animal species from Nkhotakota Wildlife Reserve, Malawi. We then applied our model to an independent dataset and evaluated its performance in terms of filtering empty images, species classification, species richness, and per-image animal counts. Our model filtered over 3 million empty images and had similar sensitivity but lower specificity than the MegaDetector model at differentiating empty images from those with animals. Classification performance was high for species with >1000 training images (average precision, recall, and F1 >0.70) and moderate overall (macro-averaged precision = 0.64, recall = 0.76, F1 = 0.63). Site-level species richness using predicted detections with and without manual review were highly concordant, especially when a score threshold of 0.95 was applied (

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEcologyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAnimalsMalawiAfricaartificial intelligencecamera trapsmachine learningMalawisoftwarewildlife monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40936206
PMCPMC12426366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.