ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
Predictive modelling in times of public health emergencies: patients' non-transport decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a surge in pre-hospital emergency calls due to the increased prevalence of flu-like symptoms and panic related to the pandemic. However, some patients declined transportation to hospital due to their fear of accessing healthcare facilities. This posed a significant risk to their health outcomes. This study aimed to utilise an extensive dataset, which included the period of the COVID-19 pandemic, in a modern Middle Eastern Emergency Medical Service to comprehend and predict the behaviour of non-transport decisions, a major multi-variable factor in pre-hospital emergency medicine.
methodsUsing Python® programming language, this study employed various supervised machine-learning algorithms, including parametric probabilistic models, such as logistic regression, and non-parametric models, including decision trees, random forest (RF), extra trees, AdaBoost, and k-nearest neighbours (KNN), using a dataset of non-transported patients (refused transport and did not receive treatment versus those who refused transport and received treatment) between 2018 and 2022. Model performance was comprehensively evaluated using Accuracy, F1 score, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC), kappa, and R-squared metrics to ensure robust model selection.
resultsFrom June 2018 to July 2022, 334,392 non-transport cases were recorded. The random forest model demonstrated the best optimised predictive performance, with accuracy = 74.78%, F1 = 0.74, MCC = 0.35, ROC AUC = 0.81, kappa = 0.34, and R-squared = 0.81.
conclusionThis study indicated that predictive modelling could accurately help identify patients who refuse transport to hospital and may not require treatment on the scene. This enables them to be redirected from the call-taking phase to alternative primary healthcare facilities. This reduces the strain on emergency healthcare resources. The findings suggest that machine learning has the potential to revolutionise pre-hospital care, especially during pandemics, by improving resource allocation and patient outcomes, while highlighting the need for ongoing research to refine these models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.