ArticleObesity surgery2025
Prediction of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease via Advanced Machine Learning Among Chinese Han Population.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-driven diagnostic and prognostic models for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: insights from clinical, imaging, and multi-omics studies-a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Regarding: association of aspirin use alone with mortality and liver-related events in MASLD: a multi-institutional three-year study.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly and accurate diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is crucial for implementing effective treatment and management strategies, as the disease can progress to more severe conditions such as cirrhosis and liver cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML) methods in detecting MASLD and provide a more effective and efficient diagnostic approach.
methodsData were collected from outpatient participants undergoing annual health checks at the Pudong District Health Care Service Centers in Shanghai, China. The discovery and independent validation cohorts included 8949 and 5973 participants, respectively. Initially, 47 variables were analyzed, and an ML-driven feature selection method identified 20 variables for MASLD prediction. To enhance clinical utility, a simplified panel of 7 variables was further derived: body mass index, albumin, alanine transaminase, glucose, high-density lipoprotein, triglyceride, and creatinine. Four ML models-k-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector machines (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and artificial neural networks (ANN)-were trained using both the 7-variable and full-variable datasets.
resultsIn the independent test set, the 7-variable models demonstrated superior performance compared to the full-variable models. The AUC values for KNN, SVM, and ANN using the 7-variable set were 0.833, 0.753, and 0.848, respectively, significantly higher than those of the full-variable models (KNN, 0.683; SVM, 0.705; ANN, 0.847). The robustness of the 7-variable panel was further validated by its generalizability across the independent cohort.
conclusionsThis study establishes a streamlined ML-driven diagnostic framework for MASLD, leveraging routinely measured clinical variables to achieve high accuracy. The simplified 7-variable model enhances early detection and risk stratification while reducing diagnostic complexity and cost. By enabling proactive interventions through actionable biomarkers (e.g., glucose and lipid profiles), this approach holds significant potential for large-scale population screening and prevention of MASLD-related complications. The findings underscore the transformative role of ML in optimizing chronic liver disease management and advancing precision hepatology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.