ArticleVisual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art2025
Development and validation of a machine learning model for predicting venous thromboembolism complications following colorectal cancer surgery.
Article in Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting venous thromboembolism risk in colorectal cancer patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a predictive model for perioperative venous thromboembolism in colorectal cancer patients based on D-dimer combined with fibrinogen levels.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- A machine learning-based risk prediction model for Hospitalized patients with deep vein thrombosis.PeerJ · 2026Article
- Deep learning algorithm enables lower limb venous thrombosis detection with CT venography.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Risk management in the dual crisis of unresectable colorectal cancer and deep vein thrombosis: navigating between hemorrhage and antithrombosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients undergoing surgery results in poor prognosis. However, there are no effective tools for early screening and predicting VTE. In this study, we developed a machine learning (ML)-based model for predicting the risk of VTE following CRC surgery and tested its performance using an external dataset. A total of 3227 CRC surgery patients were enrolled from the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University and Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital (from January 2016 to December 2023). Subsequently, 1596 patients from the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University were assigned to the training set, and 716 patients from Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital were assigned to the external validation set. A model was developed and trained using six ML algorithms using the stacking ensemble technique. Moreover, all models were developed using the tenfold cross-validation on the training set, and their performance was tested using an independent external validation set. In the training set, 173 (10.8%) patients developed VTE, 163 (10.2%) patients experienced deep venous thrombosis, and 29 (1.82%) cases had pulmonary embolism (PE). In the external validation set, 85 (11.9%) cases of VTE, 83 (11.6%) cases of deep vein thrombosis, and 14 (1.96%) cases of PE were recorded. The analysis revealed that the stacking model outperformed all other models in the external validation set, achieving significantly better performance in all metrics: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.840 (0.790-0.887), accuracy = 0.810 (0.783-0.836), specificity = 0.819 (0.790-0.848), sensitivity = 0.741 (0.652-0.825), and recall = 0.959 (0.942-0.975). The stacking model for surgical CRC patients shows promise in enabling timely clinical detection of high-risk cases. This method facilitates the prioritized implementation of prophylactic anticoagulation in confirmed high-risk individuals, thereby mitigating unnecessary pharmacological intervention in low-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.