ReviewSurgery today2025
Surgical treatment strategy for elderly patients with esophageal cancer in the new era: a narrative review.
Review in Surgery today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved operative mortality after esophagectomy in patients aged ≥ 75 years over a decade: a nationwide Japanese retrospective cohort study.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The trend of aging among patients with esophageal cancer is expected to continue in the future. We herein review the current status and future perspectives of surgical strategies for elderly patients with esophageal cancer. According to published systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses evaluating surgical risks in elderly patients with esophageal cancer, the outcomes of elderly patients were worse in terms of postoperative mortality, overall complications, pulmonary complications, cardiac complications, and the overall survival than those of non-elderly patients. In recent years, minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer has rapidly gained worldwide popularity. There is a need to reassess whether or not minimally invasive esophagectomy alters surgical indications and treatment outcomes in elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Optimizing perioperative treatment and management is also expected to promote advances in multidisciplinary treatment, including surgery, for elderly patients. Clinical studies focusing on elderly patients, along with biomarker research aimed at personalizing multidisciplinary treatment, are expected to contribute to further improvements in the treatment outcomes of elderly patients with esophageal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40936030What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.