ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Influence of Enhancement Filter Application in Panoramic Radiographs in the Detection of External Root Resorption in Mandibular Second Molars Caused by Impacted Third Molars.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the diagnostic performance of MediXpar texture analysis for C-shaped canal morphology on panoramic radiographs: a pilot study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the influence of enhancement filters on panoramic radiographs for the detection of external root resorption (ERR) in lower second molars caused by impacted third molars. One hundred and twenty-four panoramic radiographs with 182 lower third molars were selected. The corresponding cone-beam computed tomography scans were assessed to create the reference standard. The panoramic radiographs were then exported with and without four enhancement filters (Sharpness, Invert, Invert + Sharpness, and Equalized + Magnification) and independently evaluated by five examiners using a five-point scale for ERR presence. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated, and differences between filters were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test. Intra- and inter-examiner agreements were assessed using weighted Kappa index. Diagnostic values were similar across filters for AUC (0.56 to 0.61; p = 0.359), but sensitivity was lower (0.25 to 0.50; p = 0.004) and specificity higher (p = 0.002) for the Invert and Invert + Sharpness filters than for the other situations. Intra-examiner agreement was moderate, while inter-examiner agreement was fair. The diagnostic accuracy of ERR in mandibular second molars on panoramic radiographs is unaffected by filters, but sensitivity decreases with Invert and Invert + Sharpness filters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.