Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40936017›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Influence of Enhancement Filter Application in Panoramic Radiographs in the Detection of External Root Resorption in Mandibular Second Molars Caused by Impacted Third Molars.

Matheus Sampaio-Oliveira, Lucas da Silva Ponce, Thaisa Pinheiro Silva, Rocharles Cavalcante Fontelene, Amanda Farias-Gomes, Matheus L Oliveira, Deborah Queiroz Freitas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matheus Sampaio-OliveiraDepartment of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Av. Limeira, Piracicaba, SP 13414-903 , 901, Brazil. msampaio995@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0414-6395
Lucas da Silva PonceDepartment of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Av. Limeira, Piracicaba, SP 13414-903 , 901, Brazil.
Thaisa Pinheiro SilvaDepartment of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Av. Limeira, Piracicaba, SP 13414-903 , 901, Brazil.
Rocharles Cavalcante FonteleneDepartment of Stomatology, Public Health, and Forensic Dentistry (DESCOL), Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (FORP-USP)., Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Amanda Farias-GomesDepartment of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Av. Limeira, Piracicaba, SP 13414-903 , 901, Brazil.
Matheus L OliveiraDepartment of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Av. Limeira, Piracicaba, SP 13414-903 , 901, Brazil.
Deborah Queiroz FreitasDepartment of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Av. Limeira, Piracicaba, SP 13414-903 , 901, Brazil.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the influence of enhancement filters on panoramic radiographs for the detection of external root resorption (ERR) in lower second molars caused by impacted third molars. One hundred and twenty-four panoramic radiographs with 182 lower third molars were selected. The corresponding cone-beam computed tomography scans were assessed to create the reference standard. The panoramic radiographs were then exported with and without four enhancement filters (Sharpness, Invert, Invert + Sharpness, and Equalized + Magnification) and independently evaluated by five examiners using a five-point scale for ERR presence. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated, and differences between filters were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test. Intra- and inter-examiner agreements were assessed using weighted Kappa index. Diagnostic values were similar across filters for AUC (0.56 to 0.61; p = 0.359), but sensitivity was lower (0.25 to 0.50; p = 0.004) and specificity higher (p = 0.002) for the Invert and Invert + Sharpness filters than for the other situations. Intra-examiner agreement was moderate, while inter-examiner agreement was fair. The diagnostic accuracy of ERR in mandibular second molars on panoramic radiographs is unaffected by filters, but sensitivity decreases with Invert and Invert + Sharpness filters.

Indexed as

MolarMolar, ThirdRadiographic Image EnhancementRadiography, PanoramicRoot ResorptionTooth, ImpactedAdolescentAdultCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansMaleMandibleReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultDiagnosisFiltersPanoramic radiographRoot resorption

Identifiers

PMID40936017
PMCPMC13230405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.