Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40935950›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical research2025

Alternative Techniques for Porous Microparticle Production: Electrospraying, Microfluidics, and Supercritical CO

Simon Pöttgen, Christian Wischke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. How PLGA Microspheres are Emerging as a Key Drug Delivery System.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Simon PöttgenMartin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Pharmacy, Kurt-Mothes-Str. 3, 06120, Halle, Germany.
Christian WischkeMartin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Pharmacy, Kurt-Mothes-Str. 3, 06120, Halle, Germany. christian.wischke@pharmazie.uni-halle.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5531-9033

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microparticles have been established as injectable drug carriers designed to enable a long-term release of the encapsulated active pharmaceutical ingredients (API). To regulate this release, the diffusion barrier provided by the matrix material - typically hydrolytically degradable polyesters - must be controlled through precise levels of matrix porosity. This mini-review presents processing methods that are alternatives to the most common batch emulsification techniques for the manufacturing of porous polymer particles. A focus is placed on mechanistically describing the particle and pore formation in droplet-based microfluidics, electrospraying, and by supercritical fluids, critically discussing their opportunities and challenges. Ultimately, this review assesses the potential of these techniques in advancing the engineering of porous polymeric carrier systems in the light of scale-up and continuous production.

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideDrug CarriersMicrofluidicsDrug CompoundingParticle SizePolymersPorosityCarbon DioxideDrug CarriersPolymersElectrosprayingMicrofluidicsMicroparticlesPorositySupercritical fluids

Identifiers

PMID40935950
PMCPMC12507980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.