ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2025
Physical activity in kidney disease: evidence and implementation.
Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Progressive Inspiratory Muscle Training on Lung Volume and Respiratory Strength in Patients With Pre-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026Trial
- Understanding the feasibility of home-based rehabilitation in kidney transplant recipients: A mixed-methods interpretation.PloS one · 2025Trial
- Deciding between conservative kidney management and dialysis in older people with kidney failure: a narrative review.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Association of Physical Activity with Abdominal Aortic Calcification in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.Kidney & blood pressure research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite over 30 years of research and guidelines promoting physical activity for people living with chronic kidney disease (CKD), widespread implementation of physical activity in routine care remains low worldwide. Consequently, the population with CKD remains highly inactive across all stages of the disease. Randomized controlled trials in people with CKD, people on dialysis and kidney transplant recipients consistently show that structured exercise is safe and can improve physical function, cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength and aspects of quality of life. However, these trials are of variable quality with modest sample sizes in some groups, and a need exists for larger, implementation-focused studies. Evidence generation in CKD has often been disconnected from service development, limiting workforce skills, resources and pathways for delivery. To achieve meaningful change, research must be designed with implementation in mind, using frameworks that consider context, sustainability and stakeholder involvement. Digital solutions and approaches targeting 24-h movement behaviours may extend the reach of physical-activity interventions, but barriers such as health-professional training, patient capability and system-level prioritization must be addressed. Embedding physical activity in clinical care offers a clear opportunity to improve outcomes and quality of life for people living with CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40935901What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.