ArticleBMJ open2025
Attitudes and practices of hospice physicians regarding palliative sedation: a cross-sectional descriptive study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe primary aim of this study was to assess the attitudes and practices of Chinese hospice physicians involved in palliative sedation, with an additional focus on exploring factors associated with the experience of palliative sedation.
designA cross-sectional study using a web-based structured questionnaire. SETTING AND
participantsWith the support of the Hospice Committee of the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, this study employed a convenience sampling method to survey hospice physicians nationwide. Subsequently, a total of 550 questionnaires were distributed via email. OUTCOME MEASURES: Physicians' attitudes and practices regarding palliative sedation.
resultsThe statistical analysis was based on 449 valid responses. Among them, 252 had no experience with palliative sedation, while only 197 had experience in this area. Notably, the study of relevant guidelines (OR=8.01, 95% CI (5.19 to 12.38), p<0.001) and participation in training programmes (OR=5.45, 95% CI (3.62 to 8.2), p<0.001) were significantly associated with experience in palliative sedation. Among these experienced physicians, 108 physicians (54.8%) administered palliative sedation to between 1 and 5 patients, with only 21 physicians (10.7%) treating more than 20 patients over the last year. Additionally, 96 physicians (48.7%) reported feeling stressed during the administration of palliative sedation. Regarding perspectives on palliative sedation, 31 physicians (15.7%) believed it is intended to hasten death, and 60 physicians (30.5%) considered that it may shorten a patient's lifespan. Furthermore, five physicians (2.5%) perceived no difference between palliative sedation and euthanasia.
conclusionsThe findings indicate a relative scarcity of hospice physicians in China with experience in palliative sedation, with many encountering significant stress during its implementation. There is an urgent need to enhance professional training and establish guidelines for palliative sedation in China, which will provide a solid foundation for its application and foster the development of hospice care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.