Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40935671›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2025

Acute Loss of Tactile Input Leads to General Compensatory Changes in Eye-Hand Coordination during Object Manipulation.

Kevin Ung, John F Magnotti, Brandon Kim, Jeffrey M Yau, Per F Nordmark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Illusory cold desensitizes touch.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kevin UngDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2461-4379
John F MagnottiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Brandon KimDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030.
Jeffrey M YauDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030 jeffrey.yau@bcm.edu per.nordmark@umu.se.
Per F NordmarkDepartment of Medical and Translational Biology, and Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Section for Hand and Plastic Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå 901 87, Sweden jeffrey.yau@bcm.edu per.nordmark@umu.se.

Funding

Training in Neural Control of organ Degeneration and Regeneration (NeuralCODR)T32NS126115 · NINDS · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Philip J Horner · 2022 to 2026
$1.4M
NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS126115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current models of motor control emphasize the critical role of sensory feedback, as demonstrated by movement coordination deficits following sensory impairment. When both vision and touch are available for object-oriented manual behaviors, they serve distinct roles; vision guides the execution of planned movements, while touch provides more direct feedback on hand-object interactions. The impact of losing somatosensory feedback on eye-hand coordination during dexterous object manipulation tasks has not been thoroughly studied. Conceivably, vision is recruited to compensate for the feedback lost when touch is abolished based on the dexterity demands of the behavior. To investigate this, we tested healthy participants of either sex on a manual dexterity task requiring the movement of small metal pegs, both before and after the administration of digital anesthesia, which selectively abolished cutaneous sensations in the fingertips while preserving motor function. We recorded participants' gaze and hand positions. Despite loss of cutaneous feedback, participants successfully completed the pegboard task. However, they exhibited significantly longer trial times and altered force profiles. Notably, acute somatosensory loss triggered a rapid shift in visual behavior, characterized by a tighter coupling between gaze and hand positions across all task actions, even those not directly involving object manipulation. These changes, which occurred with anesthesia of the dominant and nondominant hands, were not evident with sham (saline) injections. Our findings underscore the contributions of sensory feedback to force control in service of dexterous object manipulation and reveal the nonselective nature of compensatory gaze-hand coordination processes.

Indexed as

Feedback, SensoryHandPsychomotor PerformanceTouchTouch PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultdigital anesthesiaeye-hand coordinationmanual dexteritysensorimotor integrationsomatosensory feedbackvisual compensation

Identifiers

PMID40935671
PMCPMC12494028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.