ReviewThe Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research2025
Natural Course of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.
Review in The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Subepithelial Lesion Observed in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Guideline
- A Case of Aortoesophageal Fistula Mimicking a Subepithelial Tumor.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-based endoscopic ultrasonography model for detecting the origin layer of gastric subepithelial lesions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Subepithelial Lesions Observed in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025Review
- Prevalence, natural progression, and clinical practices of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions in Korea: a multicenter study.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) are being increasingly detected owing to the widespread use of endoscopy. These lesions vary in etiology, with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), leiomyomas, and ectopic pancreas among the most common types. Because some gastric SETs, such as GISTs, have malignant potential, the development of an appropriate management plan is crucial. However, the management of gastric SETs remains challenging owing to the limited information available regarding their natural courses. In this review, currently available studies were analyzed to summarize the existing evidence on the natural history and progression of gastric SETs based on initial tumor sizes and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) features, highlighting that most small SETs (<30 mm in size) remain stable over time. Larger initial tumor sizes and irregular tumor margins, determined during EUS, are key risk factors for tumor progression. Other factors, such as older patient age, tumor location, and certain echogenic characteristics, have also been suggested to be associated with tumor progression. Additionally, tumor doubling times provide valuable information for distinguishing aggressive tumors, with high-risk GISTs demonstrating rapid growth. Surveillance strategies should be individualized based on these factors. Regular endoscopic or EUS follow-up is generally recommended for small asymptomatic SETs, with closer monitoring of lesions exhibiting high-risk features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.