ReviewThe Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research2025
Approach to Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: From Differential Diagnosis to Histologic Confirmation.
Review in The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Case of Aortoesophageal Fistula Mimicking a Subepithelial Tumor.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Article
- Advanced Gastric Cancer Presenting as a Giant Subepithelial Lesion: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-based endoscopic ultrasonography model for detecting the origin layer of gastric subepithelial lesions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The detection of gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) has increased with the widespread use of endoscopic screening. While most SELs are benign, some, such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors, have malignant potential, underscoring the importance of accurate diagnosis. Histological confirmation is often challenging due to the submucosal location of these lesions, which limits the effectiveness of conventional biopsy techniques. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) plays a central role in lesion characterization, providing information on the layer of origin, echogenicity, and internal features. When tissue sampling is required, techniques such as mucosal incision-assisted biopsy (MIAB) and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (FNB) offer complementary advantages. MIAB has demonstrated a diagnostic yield of approximately 89%, particularly for lesions <20 mm, whereas FNB provides sufficient tissue for immunohistochemical analysis. As international guidelines differ regarding indications and methods of tissue acquisition for SELs, tailored management based on EUS findings, patient-specific factors, and institutional capacity is essential for optimal diagnostic outcomes. This review aims to summarize the current understanding of gastric SELs based on evidence-based guidelines and recent studies and offer practical guidance for clinicians diagnosing these lesions in routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.