ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025
Enhancing Oral Health Diagnostics With Hyperspectral Imaging and Computer Vision: Clinical Dataset Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Hyperspectral imaging in oral oncology: a scoping review.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Use of Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosing Oral Mucosa Conditions: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Recent advance in early oral lesion diagnosis: the application of artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diseases of the oral cavity, including oral squamous cell carcinoma, pose major challenges to health care worldwide due to their late diagnosis and complicated differentiation of oral tissues. The combination of endoscopic hyperspectral imaging (HSI) and deep learning (DL) models offers a promising approach to the demand for modern, noninvasive tissue diagnostics. This study presents a large-scale in vivo dataset designed to support DL-based segmentation and classification of healthy oral tissues. Objective: This study aimed to develop a comprehensive, annotated endoscopic HSI dataset of the oral cavity and to demonstrate automated, reliable differentiation of intraoral tissue structures by integrating endoscopic HSI with advanced machine learning methods. Methods: A total of 226 participants (166 women [73.5%], 60 men [26.5%], aged 24-87 years) were examined using an endoscopic HSI system, capturing spectral data in the range of 500 to 1000 nm. Oral structures in red, green, and blue and HSI scans were annotated using RectLabel Pro (by Ryo Kawamura). DeepLabv3 (Google Research) with a ResNet-50 backbone was adapted for endoscopic HSI segmentation. The model was trained for 50 epochs on 70% of the dataset, with 30% for evaluation. Performance metrics (precision, recall, and F1-score) confirmed its efficacy in distinguishing oral tissue types. Results: DeepLabv3 (ResNet-101) and U-Net (EfficientNet-B0/ResNet-50) achieved the highest overall F1-scores of 0.857 and 0.84, respectively, particularly excelling in segmenting the mucosa (0.915), retractor (0.94), tooth (0.90), and palate (0.90). Variability analysis confirmed high spectral diversity across tissue classes, supporting the dataset's complexity and authenticity for realistic clinical conditions. Conclusions: The presented dataset addresses a key gap in oral health imaging by developing and validating robust DL algorithms for endoscopic HSI data. It enables accurate classification of oral tissue and paves the way for future applications in individualized noninvasive pathological tissue analysis, early cancer detection, and intraoperative diagnostics of oral diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.