ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2025
Patient-Reported and Radiological Outcomes of Primary Bilateral Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using a Principles-Based Approach.
Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Revision sacroiliac joint fusion: mid-term patient-reported outcomes.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBilateral sacroiliac joint fusion (BSIJF) is an accepted management strategy for sacroiliac joint dysfunction, though outcomes data are limited by patient number and lack of long-term follow-up. This study investigated the clinical, radiological, and patient-reported outcomes of BSIJF.
methodsA retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent BSIJF with a single surgeon between 2020 and 2023. All BSIJF utilized a principles-based approach: joint decortication, bone grafting, compression, and rigid stability. Patient-reported outcomes at preoperative, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up timepoints were recorded for the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), PROMIS Pain Interference (PI), and PROMIS Physical Function (PF). Fusion grading was assessed by computed tomography after 1 and 2 years.
resultsForty-eight patients who underwent BSIJF were included, of whom 31 (65%) were women with a mean age of 54 ± 14 years and a mean body mass index of 29 ± 5. Twenty-five patients (52%) had prior lumbar spine surgery (PLSS). One patient required revision for implant malpositioning and nerve impingement. Bridging bone across the sacroiliac joint was observed in 85% of patients. Numeric Pain Rating Scale scores dropped significantly from 7.6 preoperatively to 3.9, 3.3, and 3.7 at 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups, respectively (
conclusionsBSIJF is a safe and effective treatment that is associated with high rates of bony bridging at the sacroiliac joint and long-term clinically significant improvements in pain and function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.