ArticleBMJ global health2025
Strengthening financial protection through multitiered health coverage: evidence from 667 055 low-income households in China.
Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Has volume-based procurement reduced household catastrophic health expenditure in rural patients with chronic disease?-Evidence from CHARLS 2018 and 2020 in China.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Multidimensional health poverty among diabetic adults in China: evidence from the China Kadoorie Biobank.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- From individual burden to social risk pooling: drivers of the declining out-of-pocket health expenditure share in China (2009-2024).International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Reducing private health expenditure in Greece: the case for regulated complementary health insurance.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLow-income households face disproportionate out-of-pocket hardship when accessing healthcare, undermining equity and universal health coverage. To address these challenges, China implemented a three-tiered health coverage system-basic medical insurance, catastrophic medical insurance and medical assistance-but its comprehensive impact on the financial protection remains underexplored.
methodsWe analysed Shaanxi Province's Medical Assistance database (2013-2016) to evaluate the impact of China's multitiered health coverage system on financial protection by: (1) estimating the incidence of catastrophic health expenditure (out-of-pocket payments> 25% of annual income) and medical impoverishment (postpayment income <US$1.90/day) before and after reimbursement-lower incidence indicating better protection and (2) assessing income-related inequality and inequity using concentration indices and horizontal inequity indices (ranging -1 to 1, where zero indicates equality/equity, negative values indicate pro-poor and positive values pro-rich distributions). All estimates accounted for household-level clustering.
resultsA total of 667 055 households were included. After reimbursement, the incidence of catastrophic health expenditure fell from 58.59% (95% CI: 58.47 to 58.70) to 17.89% (95% CI: 17.79 to 17.97) and medical impoverishment from 41.43% (95% CI: 41.30 to 41.54) to 13.47% (95% CI: 13.38 to 13.55), driven mainly by basic medical insurance and medical assistance. Rural households received larger absolute declines yet remained higher than urban counterparts. Financial protection inequity worsened: the Horizontal Inequity Index for catastrophic health expenditure shifted from -0.0890 (95% CI: -0.0902 to -0.0879) to -0.1717 (95% CI: -0.1746 to -0.1689) and for medical impoverishment from -0.2653 (95% CI: -0.2669 to -0.2640) to -0.5251 (95% CI: -0.5280 to -0.5222), a pattern observed in both urban and rural areas.
conclusionOur findings underscore the need for a three‑tiered health coverage system-including targeted, equitable reimbursement-to advance universal health coverage. Emerging tools such as big data analytics and artificial intelligence offer new ways to monitor and optimise equity; it is timely to extend equity considerations beyond funding mobilisation to reimbursement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.