Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40935396›Full record

Trial reportBMJ global health2025

The effect of supporting districts to operationalise digital payments for vaccination campaign workers: a cluster randomised controlled trial during the 2022 polio vaccination campaign in Uganda.

Peter Waiswa, Margaret McConnell, Juliet Aweko, Daniel Donald Mukuye, Charles Opio, Maggie Ssekitto Ashaba, Andrew Bakainaga, Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05684081 (Effectiveness of Mobile Money Payments to Vaccination Campaign Health Care Workers on Polio Vaccination Campaign Coverage and Quality), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05684081 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effectiveness of Mobile Money Payments to Vaccination Campaign Health Care Workers on Polio Vaccination Campaign Coverage and Quality: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMakerere UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled2,700ConditionsPolioArmsDigital payment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peter WaiswaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Margaret McConnellGlobal Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3437-3249
Juliet AwekoDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda juliet.aweko@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7448-6726
Daniel Donald MukuyeRepublic of Uganda Ministry of Health, Kampala, Kampala, Uganda.
Charles OpioDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Maggie Ssekitto AshabaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0009-0000-0782-0886
Andrew BakainagaWorld Health Organization Country Office for Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Elizabeth Ekirapa-KirachoDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-030477World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA motivated and satisfied health workforce is critical for the success of mass vaccination campaigns targeting diseases like polio. This study examined whether supporting districts to implement electronic cash (e-cash) payments, instead of cash, increased e-cash usage and improved vaccine campaign healthcare workers' (VCHWs) motivation and satisfaction during an oral poliovirus vaccination campaign in 2022 in Uganda.

methodsIn November 2022, 54 districts and 2665 VCHWs were enrolled and randomised. Intervention districts received training on navigating the government e-cash platform, user roles, beneficiary data upload and payment report generation. Control districts received standard support. Data collected included mode of payment (cash or e-cash), VCHW motivation (primary outcome) and satisfaction with the payment method. Primary analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis, with 589 (44.1%) VCHWs in control and 765 (57.5%) in intervention districts receiving e-cash.

resultsE-cash payments were more common in intervention districts (765/1330, 57.5%) compared with controls (589/1335, 44.1%). VCHWs in intervention districts were more likely to be paid via e-cash (adjusted OR (AOR) 3.15; 95% CI: 0.40 to 10.70; p=0.079). Nearly all VCHWs (97.6%) received payments after campaign completion. There was no significant difference in motivation (AOR=0.82; 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.44; p=0.498) or satisfaction (AOR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.55; p=0.641) between groups. Participants reported e-cash as convenient, transparent, time-saving and cost-saving.

conclusionSupporting districts to operationalise digital payments increased e-cash usage among vaccination workers, despite delays. However, it did not significantly impact motivation or satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05684081.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelImmunization ProgramsMass VaccinationPoliomyelitisPoliovirus Vaccine, OralAdultFemaleHumansMaleMotivationUgandaPoliovirus Vaccine, OralCluster randomized trialHealth services researchHealth systems evaluationImmunisationPoliomyelitis

Identifiers

PMID40935396
PMCPMC12519380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.