Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40934868›Full record

ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2025

Competitive Adsorption in Polymer Nanocomposites: The Molecular Weight and End-Group Effect Revealed by SANS and MD Simulations.

Tae Yeon Kong, WooJin Kim, YongJoo Kim, So Youn Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tae Yeon KongDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Institute of Chemical Processes, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3872-0893
WooJin KimDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kookmin University, Seoul 02707, Republic of Korea.
YongJoo KimDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6037-7243
So Youn KimDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Institute of Chemical Processes, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0066-8839

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding polymer adsorption at interfaces is essential for designing advanced polymer-based nanomaterials with tailored interfacial properties. Although adsorption significantly influences the macroscopic properties of polymer composites and thin films, a comprehensive understanding of molecular weight (MW)-dependent adsorption remains challenging and controversial, particularly in polydisperse polymer systems, due to the limitations of experimental approaches. Here, we investigate competitive adsorption in bidisperse poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) melts and demonstrate that shorter chains preferentially adsorb onto nanoparticle surfaces. Combined experiments and molecular dynamics simulations reveal that the high density of terminal hydroxyl groups in short PEG chains strengthens hydrogen bonding at the interface, thereby inducing enthalpy-driven adsorption despite identical polymer backbones. This results in a densely packed interfacial layer that alters the conformation of longer chains. These findings highlight the critical role of end-group functionality in interfacial polymer behavior and provide new insights for tailoring nanocomposite properties.

Indexed as

bidisperse polymer meltcompetitive adsorptioninterfacial chain conformationpolymer adsorptionpolymer nanocompositesmall-angle neutron scattering

Identifiers

PMID40934868
PMCPMC12464899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.