ReviewDNA repair2025
Innate immune sensing and signaling: Co-opted for genome surveillance? Implications for tumorigenesis.
Review in DNA repair, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Innate immune signaling is traditionally associated with the response to pathogenic infection. However, emerging evidence suggests that nuclear innate immune sensors and their downstream pathways may also serve as a critical mechanism for genome surveillance. This review explores a model in which DNA sensors such as mouse IFI204 and IFI205 (IFI16 in humans) localize to replication forks, where they detect endogenous aberrant DNA structures and initiate an interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) transcriptional program. A key output of this transcriptional program is ISG15, which we find conjugated to fork-associated proteins and facilitates recruitment of the replication fork protection complex, thereby stabilizing replication forks under physiological conditions. We discuss how nuclear innate immune sensors mediate replication stress sensing and examine the broad consequences of downstream ISG transcription across diverse contexts-including its impact on genome stability and its dual roles in modulating tumor cell behavior and the tumor microenvironment. These findings suggest that the innate immune system, through its nuclear DNA sensing arm, may be evolutionarily co-opted for genome surveillance and may influence tumor initiation and therapy resistance. Understanding how innate immune signaling intersects with replication stress could offer mechanistic insights into tumor development and reveal novel therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.