ArticleBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
Cochlear size variation among the Argentinian population.
Article in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCochlear size, shape and the anatomy vary a lot among the human population. Cochlear size is a clinically useful parameter to determine the suitable cochlear implant electrode length. Objective is to assess the cochlear size and shape variation among the Argentine population.
methodsComputer Tomography (CT) scans of 247 ears were assessed for the cochlear parameters including basal turn diameter (A-value) and width (B-value) and the cochlear height in the mid-modiolar section (H-value) using OTOPLAN® version 4.0. Shape of cochlear basal turn was determined by the ratio between B- and A-values. Cochlear Duct Length (CDL) was estimated from the A-, and B-values.
resultsThe A-value was found to vary between 6.7 mm and 10.1 mm with a mean value of 8.7 ± 0.61 mm and the B-value was found to vary between 4.5 mm and 8.1 mm with a mean value of 6.4 ± 0.57 mm. The cochlear height as measured in the axial view from the mid-modiolar section was 3.78 ± 0.57 mm. Shape of the cochlear basal turn as determined by the ratio between B- and A-values showed 41 out of 248 ears (16.5%) have more of a round shaped basal turn with the ratio of ≥0.75 leaving the remaining 207 ears (83.5%) with more of an elliptical shaped basal turn. CDL was found to vary between 24.5 mm and 41.2 mm with a median value of 33.6 mm.
conclusionArgentine population appears to have slightly smaller cochlear size compared to population from other countries as reported in literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.