Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40934383›Full record

ArticleACS nano2025

Quantifying the Influence of Nanosheet Aspect Ratio on Network Morphology and Junction Resistance in Solution-Processed Nanosheet Networks.

Eoin Caffrey, Jose M Munuera, Cian Gabbett, Luke Doolan, Joseph Neilson, Rebekah A Wells, Mark McCrystall, Alexandra McNamara, Tian Carey, Martin Gerlei and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Eoin CaffreySchool of Physics, CRANN & AMBER Research Centres, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0174-383X
Jose M MunueraSchool of Physics, CRANN & AMBER Research Centres, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Cian GabbettSchool of Physics, CRANN & AMBER Research Centres, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Luke DoolanSchool of Physics, CRANN & AMBER Research Centres, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Joseph NeilsonSchool of Physics, CRANN & AMBER Research Centres, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2472-4869
Rebekah A WellsSchool of Physics, CRANN & AMBER Research Centres, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Mark McCrystallSchool of Physics, CRANN & AMBER Research Centres, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9262-589X
Alexandra McNamaraSchool of Physics, CRANN & AMBER Research Centres, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Tian CareySchool of Physics, CRANN & AMBER Research Centres, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8697-9421
Martin GerleiInstitute of Physics, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, Neubiberg D-85579, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-3960-7458
Paul SeifertInstitute of Physics, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, Neubiberg D-85579, Germany.
Georg S DuesbergInstitute of Physics, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, Neubiberg D-85579, Germany.
Jonathan N ColemanSchool of Physics, CRANN & AMBER Research Centres, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9659-9721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing solution-processed nanosheet networks for electronic applications requires understanding the relationship between nanosheet dimensions, network morphology, and electrical properties. Here, we fabricate graphene nanosheets with both low- and high-aspect-ratios using liquid-phase exfoliation (LPE) and electrochemical exfoliation (EE), respectively. Spray-coated networks of both nanosheet types display distinct morphological and electrical properties. High-resolution 3D imaging shows that low-aspect-ratio LPE nanosheet networks display a disordered, porous structure with point-like junctions. Conversely, high-aspect-ratio EE graphene forms low-porosity networks with highly aligned nanosheets with large-area conformal junctions. Electrical measurements demonstrate that EE networks achieve lower resistivity and reduced percolation thicknesses due to reduced junction resistances and improved nanosheet alignment. We propose a theoretical model linking nanosheet bending rigidity, aspect ratio, and junction formation, highlighting the critical role of nanosheet flexibility in enabling conformal junctions. Furthermore, by size-selecting both nanosheet types, we measure the dependence of network resistivity on nanosheet thickness. LPE networks show increasing resistivity with thickness, whereas EE networks exhibit decreasing resistivity. We develop a simple model linking these behaviors to point-like and planar junctions respectively and quantify the size-dependence of both nanosheet and junction resistance for both cases. Unexpectedly, data analysis using this model predicts the EE nanosheets to be more conductive than the LPE ones, a fact confirmed by THz spectroscopy. This study establishes the importance of nanosheet aspect ratio and flexibility in governing network morphology and electrical performance. Our findings provide key insights for developing high-performance, solution-processed 2D material networks for future electronic devices.

Indexed as

aspect ratiographenejunction resistancenanosheet network morphologyspray coating

Identifiers

PMID40934383
PMCPMC12462246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.