ArticleACS nano2025
Quantifying the Influence of Nanosheet Aspect Ratio on Network Morphology and Junction Resistance in Solution-Processed Nanosheet Networks.
Article in ACS nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrothermal-Assisted High-Yield Production of Large-Area TiSmall methods · 2026Article
- Interplay Between Exfoliation and Functionalization Strategies for Group VI Layered Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Dispersions.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Composition-Dependent Wide-Range Tunability of Optical and Electronic Properties in SnSSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Decoupling Junction and Nanosheet Transport in Graphene Networks via Simple DC Temperature-Dependent Measurements.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- The Electrical and Morphological Characteristics of Networks of Mechanically Exfoliated Nanosheets.Small science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimizing solution-processed nanosheet networks for electronic applications requires understanding the relationship between nanosheet dimensions, network morphology, and electrical properties. Here, we fabricate graphene nanosheets with both low- and high-aspect-ratios using liquid-phase exfoliation (LPE) and electrochemical exfoliation (EE), respectively. Spray-coated networks of both nanosheet types display distinct morphological and electrical properties. High-resolution 3D imaging shows that low-aspect-ratio LPE nanosheet networks display a disordered, porous structure with point-like junctions. Conversely, high-aspect-ratio EE graphene forms low-porosity networks with highly aligned nanosheets with large-area conformal junctions. Electrical measurements demonstrate that EE networks achieve lower resistivity and reduced percolation thicknesses due to reduced junction resistances and improved nanosheet alignment. We propose a theoretical model linking nanosheet bending rigidity, aspect ratio, and junction formation, highlighting the critical role of nanosheet flexibility in enabling conformal junctions. Furthermore, by size-selecting both nanosheet types, we measure the dependence of network resistivity on nanosheet thickness. LPE networks show increasing resistivity with thickness, whereas EE networks exhibit decreasing resistivity. We develop a simple model linking these behaviors to point-like and planar junctions respectively and quantify the size-dependence of both nanosheet and junction resistance for both cases. Unexpectedly, data analysis using this model predicts the EE nanosheets to be more conductive than the LPE ones, a fact confirmed by THz spectroscopy. This study establishes the importance of nanosheet aspect ratio and flexibility in governing network morphology and electrical performance. Our findings provide key insights for developing high-performance, solution-processed 2D material networks for future electronic devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.