Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40934279›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Strengthening excellence in agricultural sciences education through mentorship systems for undergraduate students to promote sustainable agricultural development.

Shenggang Pan, Zhaowen Mo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shenggang PanCollege of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhaowen MoCollege of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1887-9389

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study examines the role of mentorship in delivering high-quality undergraduate education in the agricultural sciences, and to find ways to improve mentorship systems in agricultural science education and promote sustainable agricultural development. A questionnaire survey was conducted with 329 samples, as well as a case study on a mentorship system. The questionnaire comprised 7 topics and 20 items related to mentoring relationships. The results show that mentorship played a crucial role in cultivating excellent students in agricultural science by exerting significant influences on their experience/skills/technical abilities, innovation and practical abilities, and team-work spirit. Decision-making and problem-solving abilities were also noticed as well. For mentorship opportunities to be successful, students must be aware of them. They should be of excellent quality and receive support from national bodies. Agricultural sciences education should help students fully understand the mentorship systems. Our findings offer both theoretical significance and practical value for the establishment of innovative approaches for nurturing agricultural talent and for promoting the sustainable agricultural development.

Indexed as

AgricultureMentoringMentorsStudentsSustainable DevelopmentAdultFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40934279
PMCPMC12425189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.