ArticlePloS one2025
The role of structural connectivity on brain function through a Markov model of signal transmission.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structure determines function. However, this universal theme in biology has been surprisingly difficult to observe in human brain neuroimaging data. Here, we link structure to function by hypothesizing that brain signals propagate as a Markovian process on an underlying structure. We focus on a metric called commute time: the average number of steps for a random walker to go from region A to B and then back to A. Commute times based on white matter tracts from diffusion MRI exhibit an average ± standard deviation Spearman correlation of -0.26 ± 0.08 with functional MRI connectivity data across 434 UK Biobank individuals and -0.24 ± 0.06 across 400 HCP Young Adult brain scans. The correlation increases to -0.36 ± 0.14 and to -0.32 ± 0.12 when the principal contributions of both commute time and functional connectivity are compared for both datasets. The correlations are stronger by 33% compared to broadly used communication measures such as search information and communicability. The difference further widens to a factor of 5 when commute times are correlated to the principal mode of functional connectivity from its eigenvalue decomposition. Overall, the study points to the utility of commute time to account for the role of polysynaptic (indirect) connectivity underlying brain function by assuming that signals randomly traverse along the underlying brain structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.