ArticlePloS one2025
Automated classification of clinical diagnoses in electronic health records using transformer.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From patient notes to prognostication: The revolutionary potential of event-based foundation models in orthopaedics.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in thyroid ultrasound: clinical applications and perspectives.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- From static snapshots to longitudinal trajectories: artificial intelligence in women's reproductive and ovarian health.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- AI-driven diagnostic and prognostic models for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: insights from clinical, imaging, and multi-omics studies-a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The automated classification of clinical diagnoses in electronic health records (EHRs) is critical for enhancing clinical decision-making and enabling large-scale medical research, yet existing methods struggle with heterogeneous data structures and limited annotated datasets. Current approaches fail to adequately address the dual challenges of extracting contextual medical semantics from unstructured clinical narratives while maintaining generalizability across institutions with divergent documentation practices. This study proposes a novel framework integrating three core components: a Transformer-based architecture for hierarchical feature extraction from clinical text, a multi-task learning paradigm leveraging diagnostic interdependencies, and transfer learning initialization using pretrained medical language models. Evaluation on the MIMIC-III dataset demonstrates state-of-the-art performance with 89.2% accuracy and 87.6% F1-score, outperforming conventional CNN-RNN hybrids by 8.0% in recall and showing 4.9-6.2% improvements over ablated configurations in critical metrics. The results establish that synergistic integration of contextual attention mechanisms, cross-task knowledge sharing, and medical domain adaptation effectively addresses EHR heterogeneity while reducing reliance on institution-specific annotations, providing a robust foundation for clinical decision support systems that balance accuracy with real-world implementability across diverse healthcare environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.