ArticlePloS one2025
Latent profile analysis of clinical nurses' reflective ability in relation to dual work stress.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study is to identify the latent profiles of reflective ability in clinical nurses and examine their association with dual work stress.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted using convenience sampling between October 2023 and January 2024. Clinical nurses from three tertiary general hospitals in Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, were recruited for the study. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, the Clinical Nurses' Reflective Capacity Scale, and the Dual Work Stress Scale. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify distinct reflective capacity profiles. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were employed to examine influencing factors.
resultsA total of 843 nurses participated in the study, with a mean reflective capacity score of 56.15 ± 19.39. Four latent profiles were identified: Low-Level Negative Type (65.0%), High-Recall Insightful Type (7.0%), Low-Recall Introspective Type (4.0%), and High-Level Balanced Type (24.0%). Logistic regression analysis showed that challenge stress, hindrance stress, gender, professional title, participation in reflection training, the habit of keeping a reflective journal, and job satisfaction were significant factors influencing the latent profiles of reflective capacity (P < 0.05).
conclusionReflective capacity among clinical nurses exhibits heterogeneity, with four distinct latent profiles identified. Nursing managers should tailor interventions based on the influencing factors of different profiles to enhance reflective capacity in clinical nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.