Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40934241›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

An innovative synthesis approach for Na A. Zeolite: A new pathway for enhanced performance, wastewater treatment, and antibacterial applications.

Mutairah S Alshammari, Amro H Mohamed, Samah A Mohamed, Hussein M Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mutairah S AlshammariDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Jouf University, Sakaka, Aljouf, 72341, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Amro H MohamedHousing and Building National Research Center (HBRC), Sanitary & Engineering and Environmental Institute, Giza, 12613, Dokki, Egypt.
Samah A MohamedHousing and Building National Research Center (HBRC), Sanitary & Engineering and Environmental Institute, Giza, 12613, Dokki, Egypt.
Hussein M AhmedHousing and Building National Research Center (HBRC), Sanitary & Engineering and Environmental Institute, Giza, 12613, Dokki, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5791-444X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wastewater treatment is essential for protecting water resources and public health. Zeolite-based adsorbents offer an effective and sustainable solution for this purpose, providing high selectivity and regeneration potential. Zeolites are inorganic, highly crystalline, micro-porous materials composed of aluminotecto-silicates (SiO₄ and AlO₄ tetrahedral). Synthetic zeolites are commercially favored over natural ones due to their higher purity, crystallinity, and uniform pore size. Na A. zeolite (NaAZ) is a type of synthetic zeolite widely used in various applications, including wastewater treatment, due to its excellent adsorption and ion-exchange properties. This study focus on synthesize zeolite A from meta-kaolinite using a wet chemical method. The synthesis involves a hydrothermal process in which chemical reagents are mixed in an aqueous medium and heated under controlled conditions. The resulting (NaAZ) was characterized using Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area analysis, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX). This study evaluates the synthesized (NaAZ) for the removal of chemical oxygen demand from synthetic wastewater. Various parameters affecting adsorption such as contact time pH, temperature, and adsorbent dosage were investigated. The optimized conditions were then applied to real wastewater, and the material was further tested for its antitoxic and antibacterial properties. The in vitro antibacterial activity of NaAZ was assessed against both Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 19433) and Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Enterobacter aerogenes ATCC 13048, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 15442). Under optimal conditions contact time (40 min), pH (6-7), and adsorbent dosage (0.25 g) the removal efficiencies for COD, TSS, TKN, and PO₄3⁻ were 90.69%, 90.41%, 73.75%, and 68.85%, respectively.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsWastewaterWater PurificationZeolitesAdsorptionMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredX-Ray DiffractionAnti-Bacterial AgentsWastewaterZeolites

Identifiers

PMID40934241
PMCPMC12425298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.