Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40934195›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Evaluating the effects of multimodal EEG-fNIRS neurofeedback for motor imagery: An experimental platform and study protocol.

Camille O Muller, Thomas Prampart, Elise Bannier, Isabelle Corouge, Pierre Maurel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Camille O MullerUniv Rennes, Inria, CNRS, Inserm, IRISA UMR, Empenn E.R.L. U., Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0823-7128
Thomas PrampartInria, Univ. Rennes, CNRS, IRISA, Rennes, France.
Elise BannierUniv Rennes, Inria, CNRS, Inserm, IRISA UMR, Empenn E.R.L. U., Rennes, France.
Isabelle CorougeUniv Rennes, Inria, CNRS, Inserm, IRISA UMR, Empenn E.R.L. U., Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2763-2297
Pierre MaurelUniv Rennes, Inria, CNRS, Inserm, IRISA UMR, Empenn E.R.L. U., Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2539-7414

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurofeedback (NF) enables the self-regulation of brain activity through real-time feedback extracted from brain measures. Recently, the combination of several neuroimaging methods to characterize brain activity has led to growing interest in NF. The integration of various portable recording techniques, such as electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), respectively based on electrical and hemodynamic activity, could enhance the characterization of brain responses and subsequently improve NF performance. Such multimodal NF used with motor imagery (MI) could benefit post-stroke motor rehabilitation to stimulate neuroplasticity of the lesioned motor areas. Nevertheless, their concomitant use in NF to identify brain activity features during upper-limb MI-based NF has not been studied to our knowledge. The objective of this paper is to present our fully operational experimental platform and the study protocol we propose to assess the benefits of combining EEG and fNIRS for NF in the context of MI.

methodsWe developed a custom experimental platform, including a cap integrating EEG and fNIRS sensors, along with software for real-time signal processing, NF score calculation and visual feedback presentation. To evaluate the effect of EEG-fNIRS NF in the context of MI, thirty right-handed participants will undergo three randomized NF conditions: EEG-only, fNIRS-only and EEG-fNIRS based NF. EEG electrodes and fNIRS channels will be positioned above the sensorimotor cortices. Participants will be presented with a visual representation of a ball along a one-dimensional gauge moving upwards according to their brain activity level as they perform a MI task of their left-hand. An NF score will be computed from the right primary motor cortex activity along the three different experimental conditions (EEG-only, fNIRS-only, EEG-fNIRS). The association between the NF score, the neuroimaging modality and the motor imagery strategy will then be analyzed. DISCUSSION: The designed experimental platform allows combined EEG-fNIRS NF. The presented study protocol will be the first investigation of the effects of multimodal neurofeedback using EEG and fNIRS during upper-limb MI tasks. We hypothesize that presenting the participants with a visual NF representing a score based on both EEG and fNIRS signals will result in more specific task-related brain activity in the sensorimotor cortices. With potentially increased neuroplasticity, such a system could find applications in clinical contexts, particularly in motor rehabilitation, for example in post-stroke units.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyImagery, PsychotherapyImaginationNeurofeedbackAdultBrainFemaleHumansMaleSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredStroke RehabilitationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40934195
PMCPMC12425317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.