Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40934183›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Elementary students' social, emotional, and cognitive development during the COVID- 19 pandemic in North America: A scoping review.

Julia Yates, Cole Young, Tara Mantler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia YatesHealth and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9405-3642
Cole YoungHealth and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5807-4116
Tara MantlerHealth and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID- 19 pandemic and subsequent disruptions to in-person learning presented unanticipated challenges to elementary school systems across North America. Elementary students are particularly vulnerable to the negative outcomes of extended online learning, as this developmental stage is crucial for the social, emotional, and cognitive growth of students. To date, no research has synthesized what we currently know about the impacts of the pandemic on these developmental outcomes among students. As such, this scoping review explores and synthesizes what is currently known regarding elementary students' social, emotional, and cognitive development during the COVID- 19 pandemic in North America. In accordance with the Joanna Briggs Guide, three databases were searched in September 2024, and results were uploaded into Covidence wherein they were screened for eligibility. A total of 13 peer-reviewed articles met the inclusion criteria for this review (i.e., included elementary students, spoke to social/emotional/cognitive development, peer-reviewed articles written in English and conducted in North America). Thematic analyses revealed four themes including (1) lack of socialization opportunities; (2) emotional regression; (3) cognitive gaps in learning; and (4) inequitable impacts on development. School-based supports are needed for all students, but particularly those facing multiple, intersecting health and social disparities, to bolster positive development post-pandemic and to mitigate long-term negative health outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID40934183
PMCPMC12425295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.