ArticlePloS one2025
Habitat prioritization for bat conservation: A case study in Vietnam.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bats play a vital role in ecosystems through providing essential functions and services, such as pollination and pest control, but they face many threats from anthropogenic activities, climate change, and diseases. While establishing protected areas can be a conservation measure to mitigate bats' population declines and habitats loss, the effectiveness of current protected areas in conserving bat species remains poorly understood. Using Vietnam as a case, this study aims to evaluate the representation of the existing protected area network for bats in terms of the proportion of their distribution ranges covered and the number of well-covered species. We also identified areas that would improve the representation using the spatial prioritization approach. Our results showed that while Vietnam's protected area network provides better representation than random allocation, it currently only covers 6.12% of bat distribution ranges on average, leaving the distribution areas of more than 78 (96%) of the 81 species examined in this study insufficiently represented. Through the spatial prioritization, the forests in Central Highlands, western Central Coast, and Northwest were identified as the key regions for bats. Expanding the current network to cover 9% and 30% of the land under the national and global targets could improve the range coverage to 11.89% and 41.99%, respectively, reducing the number of poorly represented bats to 10-23 (12.3-28.4%) species. These findings offer critical insights for conservation practitioners and policymakers into prioritizing resources and efforts for improving conservation of not only bats in Vietnam but also biodiversity in general in other places.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.