ArticlePloS one2025
Scaling up coral spawn collection: Impacts of method and timing on Acropora valida larval quality.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scaling up coral reef restoration to ecologically relevant scales presents a significant challenge during propagule collection. Mass coral spawning events are a vast source of propagules for reef restoration, but these events are typically limited to a few nights annually. Various methods of spawn collection following spawning events are available, ranging from traditional small-scale collection to industrial large-scale collection. However, comparisons between methods and potential effects on larval integrity are poorly understood. In this laboratory-based study, different methods of spawn collection - buckets, nets, and diaphragm pumping - were tested at various time points following spawning to explore potential impacts on embryo integrity, larval size, rate of deformities, and larval settlement. Results indicated that the collection method and, especially, the timing of collection, were critical. While bucket collection had minimal impact on embryo integrity, net and pump techniques caused high embryo fragmentation (>45%) at 5-11 hours post-fertilisation when embryos were >8 cells. This significantly reduced the average size of developing larvae in net and pump collections 3-11 hours post-fertilisation. When collections took place within the first hour of fertilisation before embryo cleavage, using any collection method resulted in minimal fragmentation (<4%). In general, net samples had larger larvae than pumped samples. However, larger larvae appeared to be more prone to deformities, and deformed larvae exhibited reduced settlement success (4% deformed vs 25% intact). These results highlight how large-scale spawn collections can be conducted without compromising larval quality when timed carefully, offering practical guidance for scaling coral reef restoration efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.