ArticleScience progress
Contrast-induced encephalopathy following endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigation of Contrast-Induced Neurotoxicity and the Effects of Sildenafil andBrain sciences · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contrast-induced encephalopathy (CIE) is a rare but potentially serious complication that can occur after endovascular procedures involving iodinated contrast media. This report describes two cases of CIE following elective treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The first case involved patients in their 70s patient with multiple comorbidities who developed neurological symptoms, including right gaze preference, left hemibody incoordination, and diffuse right cerebral hemispheric edema, after receiving a flow-diverting stent. The second case was a patient in their late 70s with a history of subarachnoid hemorrhage who experienced progressive encephalopathy after coil embolization, despite initially normal imaging findings. Both patients were managed with supportive care, including anticonvulsants and aggressive fluid management, and both showed significant neurological improvement within days. These cases highlight the diagnostic challenges of CIE, as imaging findings may vary, and underscore the need for clinicians to maintain a high index of suspicion, particularly in patients with risk factors such as advanced age, hypertension, and prior cerebrovascular events. Early recognition, prompt supportive management, and close monitoring are essential. Importantly, CIE can occur even with the use of modern, low-osmolar contrast agents like Isovue-300, emphasizing the need for continued vigilance and further research into prevention and risk factor identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.