ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025
Scanpath EEG dynamic, a new perspective for neuroaesthetic connoisseurship in paintings.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-pathway processing of AI-generated Chinese ink painting: evidence from eye-tracking, EEG, and artistic expertise.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Embodied neuroaesthetics and the psychotherapeutic relational field.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Editorial: At the borders of movement, art, and neurosciences, volume II.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Audience attitudes and aesthetic perception of digitally empowered contemporary lacquer painting: a survey-based technology-imagery-perception model.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The analysis of ocular scanpaths during the observation of artistic pictures has paved the way for neuroaesthetics to question the involvement of brain mechanisms during artistic experiences. In this review, we revisit the main aspects of three fundamental domains of investigation implicated in the perception of art and beauty: (1) oculomotor science, (2) vision, and (3) the dynamics of brain oscillations. For each of these fields, central elements are highlighted to demonstrate their functional inter-dependency for the future development of neuroaesthetics, upon which connoisseurship expertise depends. Namely, the scanpath theory, linked to basic neurophysiological concepts such as saccadic and blink suppression, fixational eye movements, and sensorimotor mnemonic, were described and integrated with other important elements of visual search. The meaning, saliency, and integrated priority maps were discussed in relation to working memory and consciousness. Then, the basic and specialized networks of the visual framework were reviewed in relation to bottom-up, top-down, and corollary discharge mechanisms. Finally, the EEG dynamics of alpha and gamma oscillations were proposed to decipher the involvement of brain wave generators during scanpath artistic exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.